我国检察机关论文：论检察机关侦查权配置

　我国检察机关论文：论检察机关侦查权的配置

　【中文摘要】侦查权配置不仅仅是一个单纯的法理问题而且涉及政治制度安排,与国家的刑事政策和反腐斗争紧密相关。就是指是检察机关在刑事诉讼中用什么样的手段和方式来保证检察机关侦查权的合理配备和布置,以实现侦查权的价值。本文一开始从绪论中将本文的写作进行了说明,并对现在本论题的研究现状予以说明。已经给出的侦查权配置的定义入手,对侦查权配置的两种模式和影响侦查权配置的条件论证了什么是侦查权的配置,怎么样配置。侦查权的横向配置,也就是立法者在设计实体法时将众多的案件按照一定的划分标准,各个侦查机关按照这个标准来享有立案管辖的权力。然而,随着社会的发展,犯罪的类型越来越多,犯罪的手段也越来越多样,犯罪也也越向专业化、职业化发展,黑社会团伙性质、犯罪集团性质、官商结合、国家公职人员沦为黑保护伞的案件越来越多,使侦查权的配置不得不因犯罪类型的增多而在享有侦查权的部门中重新分配。为了有效维护法律秩序,实现刑罚遏制犯罪的功能,需要提高侦查的效率；因而加强侦查机关专业化建设,也成为一个现实的选择。侦查权的横向配置,客观上有利于侦查机关的专业化分工,从而提高不同侦查机关侦查其所管辖的犯罪案件的侦查能力；同时也有利于明确责任。检察机关侦查权的配置比其他机关享有的范围。在程序中,其他侦查机关的侦查权实现比较单一,而检察机关侦查权的实现是贯穿于刑事诉讼每个阶段的。具体来说其他侦查机关对案件只享有案件的启动权,即立

　案和调取证据的权力。而检察机关的侦查权包括办理自己管辖的职务犯罪案件,还有侦查监督权,以及在审查起诉阶段中的补充侦查权,审判阶段的侦查权等等,也就是说检察机关侦查权配置的实现程序比其他侦查机关更加广泛,这是由检察机关法律监督机关的性质决定的,因此检察机关侦查权配置贯穿于整个刑事程序中。在检察机关中也包括了纵向的配置和横向的配置。因为我国上下级检察机关是领导和被领导的关系,而非法院的指导关系,因此在检察机关侦查权配置的纵向划分中就存在上级检察机关对下级检察机关的案件操控权。而横向的侦查权配置则是检察机关对其他侦查机关的侦查监督权失控后,即对其他侦查机关的违法渎职人员的查办。从我国现行刑事诉讼法律规定来看,侦查权配置模式是纵向与横向混合采用；既采用了纵向配置模式中的部分内容(将侦查措施决定权、侦查行为监督权、侦查措施执行权等分别授权给不同的机关行使),又采用了横向配置模式中的部分内容(将犯罪侦查权按照类型不同分别授权给公安机关、检察机关、国家安全机关、军队保卫部门、监狱行使)。在现行侦查权配置模式中,检察机关既行使职务犯罪侦查权、又行使侦查监督权与部分侦查措施决定权等。从原理上讲,一项制度的设计在客观上的运作效果往往与其主观上的目标设定密切相关,制度设计的制约着甚至决定着制度的框架及其实践效果。这种现行的侦查权配置模式导致检察机关在工作中遭遇到种种困难与问题。

　【英文摘要】Power of investigation is not just a simple configuration problem but a political system of legal

　arrangements, with the state’s criminal policies and the fight against corruption are closely related. Means is used in criminal proceedings, prosecutors what kind of means and methods to ensure the prosecution and investigation with the right to a reasonable arrangement to achieve the right detection value. Introduction This paper will start from the purposes of this article describes, and the topic of this situation now be described. Has been given the right configuration with the definition of investigation, the investigation right configuration of the two modes and the conditions of investigation right configuration investigation demonstrated what is the right configuration, how to configure. Investigation right lateral configuration, that is, when lawmakers in the design of substantive law, many cases will be classified according to certain criteria, all investigating authorities have placed on

　accordance with the standards under the jurisdiction of the authority. However, with the development of society, more and more types of crime, crime means more and more diverse, the more crime but also to professional and career development, the nature of triad gangs, the nature of criminal groups, officials and businessmen with the state public people become more and more cases of the black

　umbrella, so that the configuration of investigation right type of crime had increased due to enjoy the power of investigation in the sector re-allocation. In order to effectively maintain law and order, to achieve the function of the penalty to curb crime, the need to improve the efficiency of the investigation; and thus strengthen the investigative specialization, has become a realistic option. Investigation right lateral configuration, the objective is conducive to investigating authorities of the specialized division of labor, thereby enhancing the detection of various investigative agencies under the jurisdiction of criminal cases its investigative capacity; but also help define responsibilities. Power in the prosecution investigation have more than the range of other organs. In the program, other investigative agencies to achieve relatively simple power of investigation, and prosecution investigation is the realization of the right to run through every stage of criminal proceedings. The right lateral configuration of investigation is the prosecution’s investigation to other investigative agencies supervise out of control, that is, to other investigating authorities investigating officers of illegal misconduct. From our point of view the existing criminal law, investigation right

　configuration mode is the vertical and horizontal mixed-use; only by the vertical part of configuration mode (the decision will be detection measures to detect behavior supervision, investigation, respectively, the right to authorize implementation of the measures to different organs of the exercise), but also by the lateral part of configuration mode (to the right in accordance with different types of criminal investigations were licensed to the public security organs, prosecutors, state security organs, military security departments, the prison exercise). In principle, a system designed to operate on an objective and its subjective effects are often closely related to goal setting, the system is designed to restrict or even determine the institutional framework and its practical effects. The current configuration mode of investigation led to the prosecution the right to work in all kinds of difficulties and problems encountered. 【关键词】我国检察机关 侦查权配置 两种模式 存在缺陷 如何完善 【英文关键词】Of prosecution

　 Investigative Power Configuration

　 two modes

　 Defect

　 How to improve 【目录】论检察机关侦查权的配置???摘要

　??6-7?????Abstract??7-8?????第 1 章 绪论??11-13?????1.1 问题的提出??11-12?????1.2 研究现状??12?????1.3 本文研究的主要思路和方法??12-13?????第 2 章 检察机关侦查权配置概述??13-19?????2.1 检察机关侦查权配置概述??13-17?????2.1.1 检察机关侦查权配置概念??13-14?????2.1.2 检察机关侦查权配置的影响条件??14-15?????2.1.3 检察机关侦查权配置的模式??15-16?????2.1.4 检察机关侦查权配置的形式和特点??16-17?????2.2 我国检察机关侦查权配置情况??17-19?????第 3章 国外检察机关侦查权配置的启示??19-25?????3.1 英美法系检察机关侦查权配置概况??19-21?????3.1.1 英国??19-20?????3.1.2 美国??20-21?????3.2 大陆法系检察机关侦查权配置概况??21-22?????3.2.1 法国??21?????3.2.2 德国??21-22?????3.3 日本检察机关侦查权配置概况??22-24?????3.4 国外检察机关侦查权配置的启示??24-25?????第 4 章 我国检察机关侦查权配置中存在的缺陷??25-32?????4.1 检察机关侦查权横向配置不合理??25?????4.2 检察机关侦查权纵向配置分散??25-26?????4.3 检察机关侦查权配置措施和手段受限??26-27?????4.4 检察机关引导侦查权缺位??27-28?????4.5 检察机关补充侦查权配置不当??28-32?????第 5 章 检察机关侦查权配置的完善??32-40?????5.1 扩大侦查权配置中横向配置模式的范围??32-33?????5.2 相对集中检察机关侦查权纵向配置??33-34?????5.3 加强检察机关侦查措施力度和特殊侦查手段??34-36?????5.4 赋予检察机关引导侦查的权力??36-38?????5.5 取消检察机关的补充侦查权??38-40?????结语??40-42?????致谢??42-43?????参考文献??43-46?????攻读硕士学位期间发表的论文??46??

相关热词搜索：检察机关 配置 我国